FacebookTwitterLinkedInTelegramCopy LinkEmail
Others

Open USD Explained: What Makes This Stablecoin Different?

Open USD Explained: What Makes This Stablecoin Different?

Open USD has launched with rewards and potential company ownership for eligible partners, aiming to give businesses a financial reason to adopt its dollar-backed stablecoin.

Key Takeaways

  • Eligible partners can earn rewards and equity.
  • Company ownership is separate from holding OUSD.
  • Circle already shares revenue with distribution partners.
  • Free conversions do not mean free payments.

Open Standard announced OUSD’s launch on September 30, with native support on Ethereum, Base, Solana and Tempo. Bridge, a Stripe company, issues the stablecoin. Open Standard runs the initiative, whose five initial founding partners are Coinbase, Mastercard, Shopify, Stripe and Visa.

The ownership offer helps explain how Open USD intends to attract businesses that already have other payment options. A provider that brings customers to OUSD can share in its growth. For the merchant receiving a payment, the benefit depends on what that provider delivers: accessible funds, reliable transfers and competitive fees.

Who earns the income behind a digital dollar?

A dollar-backed stablecoin has reserves supporting the tokens in circulation. Those assets can earn income, creating a business opportunity for the issuer and the companies that help distribute its token.

Open Standard’s original announcement says participating partners receive OUSD’s reserve earnings after a small management fee covering operational costs. That proposal was part of the initial Open USD partner announcement in June.

Revenue sharing already exists in the stablecoin market. Circle’s second-quarter filing records distribution payments to Coinbase and other partners. Open USD therefore needs a stronger competitive case than simply paying businesses that bring it customers.

Its equity programme adds a longer-term interest in the company’s success. Reserve rewards provide income under the programme’s terms; shares give an eligible partner ownership in Open Standard itself.

How partners can earn ownership

The company’s September 24 ownership update says founders and participating partners can earn equity based on the OUSD supply and activity they generate on their platforms. Open Standard also plans a board drawn from founders and representing shareholders.

CEO Zach Abrams told CoinDesk that the “overwhelming majority” of the company’s equity would eventually be distributed to founders and other partners according to their contribution to the network’s growth. The report said the qualifying threshold had not been disclosed.

Considering both supply and activity gives partners a reason to attract balances and support transactions. The precise measurement matters, however. A high transfer total can include movements between a company’s own wallets, so it cannot establish customer demand on its own.

For readers, owning OUSD and owning shares in Open Standard are separate arrangements. Buying or receiving the stablecoin does not itself grant company ownership. Equity concerns eligible partners and depends on their participation in the programme.

Follow the payment to see who benefits

Consider a hypothetical payment platform that introduces OUSD for merchant payouts. The platform assesses the integration costs, the rewards it can earn and its eligibility for equity. If those terms are attractive, it has a commercial reason to offer OUSD to its customers.

The merchant receiving the payout has a different calculation: how much money arrives, when it becomes available and what it costs to turn it into funds the business can spend. The platform’s financial incentive helps explain its choice of token, but does not establish that the merchant receives a better deal.

Stripe’s documentation describes OUSD support for receiving and holding funds, payouts, payments and card spending. It also says availability depends on the product, country, network and release status. A merchant’s access therefore depends on the particular service being offered.

The previously announced Ethereum rollout provides one network option for those services. For an Ethereum payout, the merchant needs a compatible wallet or provider. The same practical check applies to the other supported networks; their inclusion does not establish that a particular service supports transfers between them.

Free minting and redemption cover only part of the cost

Open USD allows businesses to create tokens against dollars and redeem them back at a one-to-one rate without minting or redemption charges. That removes a potential expense for a provider regularly moving money into and out of the stablecoin.

There are still other costs to assess. In his September explanation of the business model, Abrams described a small transaction fee charged to developers. A complete payment can also involve provider charges, network fees and conversion into another currency.

For the merchant in our example, the relevant comparison is the final amount available to spend and the time taken to receive it. A saving on one operation may be offset by another charge. The partner reward offer does not establish what a provider will charge its customers.

The evidence needs to reach beyond partner sign-ups

An integration announcement shows that a business is offering OUSD. Repeat use and payment outcomes would help establish whether customers find that service worthwhile. Future updates can be assessed against three questions:

What would demonstrate progress?
Question Evidence to look for
Do customers keep using it? Recurring merchant payouts and business payments, with internal wallet transfers identified separately.
Are recipients better served? Lower total fees or quicker access to spendable funds, compared with the same payment through an existing service.
Can partners assess the ownership offer? Clear eligibility and allocation terms, followed by disclosed equity awards linked to partners’ contributions.

A provider can earn more from OUSD without charging its customers less. Evidence of lower total fees and easier access to funds would show whether the ownership model improves the payment service, and gives merchants a reason to keep using it.

Author
Alex Stephanov is Editor-in-Chief of Coindoo

Reporter at Coindoo

Alex is Editor-in-Chief of Coindoo and co-founder of Millennial Media Group, with nearly a decade of experience covering financial markets - crypto first, then everything else. It started in 2016 with Bitcoin. Like most people at the time, he didn't fully understand it - so he kept digging. Blockchain, tokenomics, the projects, the cycles. That curiosity never stopped, and eventually pulled him into traditional markets too: equities, commodities, macro. Not because he left crypto behind, but because you can't properly understand one without the other. What drives him is straightforward: he wants to know why something is happening, not just that it's happening. Most market coverage stops at the headline - price up, price down, here's a chart. Alex finds that kind of reporting actively unhelpful. If you walk away from an article without understanding the mechanism behind the move, what did you actually learn? He holds a degree in Tourism from New Bulgarian University - not the most obvious path into financial markets, but markets have a way of pulling in people who are simply too curious to stay out. He has authored over 200 in-depth analyses and more than 10,000 articles across crypto and traditional finance. He still thinks every day in markets teaches him something new. That's probably why he hasn't stopped.

Learn more about crypto and blockchain technology.

Glossary