Austria’s First Published MiCA Sanction: Bitpanda Fined €70,000

Austria’s Financial Market Authority (FMA) has fined Bitpanda GmbH €70,000 for breaches of the EU’s Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation, known as MiCA.
Published on August 14, the decision is the first final MiCA penalty ruling made public by the FMA. The regulator said the ruling is final.
What Bitpanda Was Fined For
The €70,000 sanction relates to a crypto-asset whitepaper and the marketing published around it. The FMA’s findings concern the timing of that information and the details included in the promotion.
First, the regulator said Bitpanda did not submit the whitepaper at least 20 working days before its publication. It then said Bitpanda distributed marketing material before publishing that whitepaper.
The FMA also found that the marketing communication omitted:
- the required statement that the whitepaper had not been reviewed or approved by a competent authority and that the provider was solely responsible for it; and
- a telephone number and email address.
The issue was therefore not simply whether a whitepaper existed. It was whether investors received the document before the promotion, and whether that promotion clearly identified the provider’s responsibility and the lack of regulatory approval.
The FMA’s public notice does not identify the crypto-asset, offer or campaign involved. It also does not allege a custody breach, security incident or loss of client assets.
Why the Case Matters Beyond the Fine
Bitpanda GmbH received MiCA authorisation from the FMA in April 2025 for custody, exchange, order execution and transfer services.
The penalty is a useful reminder that authorisation and compliance are different things. A MiCA licence allows a firm to provide defined crypto services. It does not exempt the firm from the rules around a specific whitepaper or marketing campaign.
The FMA itself stressed that the fact this is the first published case does not make Bitpanda or the breaches uniquely significant. It establishes a public enforcement example, not a ranking of the industry’s worst violations.
MiCA Has Reached Enforcement
In its statement, FMA said:
“MiCAR is no longer only a licensing and supervisory issue; it has also reached enforcement.”
That is the broader significance of the ruling. MiCA is now producing public, final sanctions for failures in how crypto offers are documented and promoted.
Three Checks for Crypto Investors
When a platform promotes a crypto offer, investors can make three simple checks before acting:
- Find the relevant whitepaper before relying on the promotion.
- Check whether the marketing identifies the responsible entity and provides contact details.
- Look for the statement that the whitepaper has not been approved by the regulator.
Promotional material is designed to attract attention. The whitepaper is where investors can examine the information the provider is legally required to disclose.
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, financial or investment advice.









